🔍

CyberCX vs Kaine Mathrick Tech (KMT): Which MSP is Better? | The MSP Playbook

Article 2026-06-11

CyberCX vs Kaine Mathrick Tech (KMT)

A detailed comparison of two major Australian Managed Service Providers.

Feature CyberCX Kaine Mathrick Tech (KMT)
Overall Score3.24.2
TypeSecurity / Private EquityAgile Mid-Market
Employees500-100050-100
Founded20192015
HeadquartersMelbourne, VICSydney, NSW
RevenuePrivatePrivate
Salary Range$80,000 - $165,000$75,000 - $155,000
SpecialtiesCybersecurity, Penetration Testing, SOC, Incident ResponseManaged Services, Automation, Cloud, Security
CertificationsISO 27001, CREST, SOC 2, PCI DSSMicrosoft Partner, Rewst Certified, AWS Partner
Green FlagsCybersecurity focus is high-demand
Good technology exposure
Growing rapidly		Highest-rated small MSP
Excellent culture
Good technology focus
Red FlagsRapid acquisition strategy creates integration challenges
Below-market salaries at senior levels
Cultural inconsistency across acquired companies		Small scale
Limited enterprise exposure
Worker ProsCybersecurity focus
Good tech exposure
Growing		Excellent culture
Technology focus
High Glassdoor rating
Worker ConsAcquisition chaos
Below-market pay
Cultural inconsistency		Small scale
Limited enterprise exposure

Which MSP Should You Choose?

Both Security / Private Equity and Agile Mid-Market have strengths and weaknesses. Your choice depends on your priorities — whether that's career growth, salary, work-life balance, or technical exposure.

Use the side-by-side comparison tool for a deeper look, or check out individual profiles for detailed employee reviews.