If you work in IT in Australia, you have probably been approached by a recruiter offering a contracting gig at an MSP — or at least wondered whether going independent is worth the risk. The answer depends on your career stage, financial situation, and appetite for uncertainty.
Here is a straight comparison of being an employee versus a contractor inside the MSP ecosystem.
The Pay Gap Is Real — But Misleading
Contractors at MSPs typically earn $100–$180 per hour in the Australian market, compared to salaried employees who might be on $85,000–$130,000 per year. On paper, the contractor number looks dramatically better.
But the gross figure hides critical differences:
- No paid leave. No annual leave, no sick leave, no public holidays. If you take a week off, you earn zero.
- No super guarantee. While employers must pay 12% super on salary, contracting through your own entity means you must self-contribute — and most contractors underfund their retirement.
- No workers' compensation. If you get injured on-site, you are relying on personal insurance or Medicare.
- No training budget. Certifications, conference attendance, and professional development come out of your pocket.
When you run the numbers honestly, factoring in a realistic 8 weeks of unpaid leave per year (holidays, sick days, public holidays), the effective hourly rate of a contractor shrinks by roughly 15%. Add in the cost of insurance, accounting, and self-funded super, and the gap narrows further.
The real comparison: A salaried employee on $120,000 plus super ($134,400 total package) versus a contractor billing $130/hour for 46 weeks ($239,200 gross) — but after leave, insurance, super, and accounting ($40,000–$50,000 in overhead), the contractor nets roughly the same or slightly more. The premium for contracting is far smaller than the headline numbers suggest.
Leave and Entitlements
This is where employment wins outright:
- 4 weeks annual leave (minimum, often more for senior roles)
- 10 days personal/carer's leave per year
- Public holidays — 8–10 per year depending on your state
- Long service leave after 7+ years
- Parental leave — 12 weeks paid at the federal government rate, plus employer top-ups at better MSPs
Contractors get none of this. If you need a week off for a family emergency, that is $5,000–$10,000 out of your pocket (depending on your rate). For many IT professionals, this alone is enough to justify employment.
Job Security and Stability
MSPs have high staff turnover. Whether you are an employee or a contractor, the risk of project cancellations, restructures, or business failure is real.
However, the dynamics differ:
As an employee: - You are covered by the Fair Work Act and National Employment Standards - Redundancy pay applies after 12 months of service - Wrongful termination claims are possible - Notice periods protect you (typically 1–4 weeks depending on tenure)
As a contractor: - Your contract can be terminated with 1–4 weeks' notice (or immediately for convenience clauses) - No redundancy entitlements - No unfair dismissal protection - Limited recourse if the MSP stops paying — chasing debt as a contractor is expensive
The irony is that contractors often talk about "freedom" while having significantly less legal protection than employees. The MSP can drop you tomorrow; an employee must be managed through a formal process.
Career Growth and Skill Development
This is where it gets nuanced:
Employees benefit from: - Structured training programs (some MSPs invest heavily in this) - Internal promotions — moving from helpdesk to engineer to team lead - Exposure to diverse environments across multiple clients - Mentorship from senior engineers - Company-sponsored certifications (Microsoft, Cisco, CompTIA)
Contractors benefit from: - Broader exposure — different MSPs, different industries, different tech stacks - Faster skill acquisition through variety - Ability to specialise and command premium rates - No office politics blocking progression - Direct correlation between effort and income
The best path depends on where you are in your career. If you are early-career (1–5 years), employment gives you structure, mentorship, and a safety net while you build skills. If you are mid-to-senior (7+ years), contracting lets you leverage your expertise for higher pay and more interesting work.
Insurance and Liability
Contractors carry meaningful liability that employees do not:
- Professional indemnity insurance — essential if you are making recommendations or implementing changes. Most MSPs require this.
- Public liability insurance — covers third-party claims.
- Cyber liability insurance — increasingly required if you are handling client data.
- Income protection insurance — critical since you have no sick leave.
These policies can cost $3,000–$8,000 per year depending on your scope of work and revenue. Employees get all of this covered through their employer.
Tax Considerations
Contractors can access tax deductions that employees cannot:
- Home office expenses
- Vehicle costs for travel between sites
- Equipment purchases (laptops, monitors, networking gear)
- Professional development and memberships
- Accounting and legal fees
However, the ATO has tightened rules around personal services income (PSI) for IT contractors. If more than 80% of your income comes from a single client, you may be classified as a "personal services business" and lose many of these deductions. Most IT contractors working at MSPs are at risk of PSI classification.
Pro tip: If you are contracting to a single MSP, work with an accountant who understands PSI rules. Getting this wrong can result in significant ATO penalties.
The Hybrid Approach
Many experienced IT professionals split their time — working 3–4 days as a permanent employee and taking on consulting or side projects. This gives them:
- The security and entitlements of employment
- The income boost from occasional contracting
- Diverse experience without fully leaving stability behind
This is increasingly common and is often the best of both worlds, provided your employment contract allows it.
So Which Should You Choose?
There is no universal answer. Here is a decision framework:
| Factor | Choose Employment | Choose Contracting |
|---|---|---|
| Career stage | Early (0–5 years) | Mid-senior (7+ years) |
| Risk tolerance | Low | High |
| Family situation | Dependents, mortgages | Single, flexible |
| Financial goals | Stability | Maximise income |
| Skill level | Still building | Deep expertise |
| Insurance priority | High | Already covered |
| ATO exposure | N/A | Manage PSI risk |
The honest truth: contracting at an MSP is rarely as lucrative as it appears. It works best for experienced engineers who genuinely enjoy variety, have their financial house in order, and understand the real costs of going independent. For everyone else, employment at a well-managed MSP is probably the better bet.
Related Reading
- Salary Arbitrage Calculator — See exactly how much of your rate the MSP pockets
- The Salary Black Hole — Why MSP salaries have stagnated for a decade
- Fair Work Rights for IT Workers — Know your legal protections as an employee
- The Broken MSP Model — Why the industry's economics hurt everyone
- How to Leave an MSP — Your exit strategy whether you are employed or contracting
Was this helpful?