Behind every MSP is a web of vendor relationships that shape what services you receive, how much you pay, and which technologies get recommended. These relationships are not inherently bad — but they are rarely transparent to the end client.
How MSP Vendor Partnerships Work
MSPs establish partnerships with technology vendors through formal programs:
- Microsoft Cloud Solution Provider (CSP) — Allows MSPs to resell Microsoft 365 and Azure licensing, earning a margin on every seat
- Cisco Partner Program — Provides access to discounted hardware, training, and co-marketing funds
- Datto/Kaseya Partnerships — Grants access to RMM and PSA tools at wholesale pricing
- Fortinet/Palo Alto Partner Programs — Offers security hardware and software at partner rates
These programs are structured around tiers: the more you sell, the better your margins and benefits. A Microsoft Gold Partner, for example, earns higher rebates than a standard CSP.
The incentive structure: MSPs are financially motivated to recommend products from their vendor partners — not necessarily the best product for the client.
The Microsoft Effect
No vendor relationship impacts MSPs more than Microsoft's. Here is why:
Licensing Margins
When an MSP resells Microsoft 365 Business Premium at $33/user/month, they might pay Microsoft $22/user/month through their CSP agreement. That $11 margin covers the MSP's overhead for managing the licence — or it is pure profit if management is minimal.
This creates a strong incentive to: - Push higher-tier licences — Business Premium earns more margin than Business Basic - Bundle licensing with services — The MSP adds a "management fee" on top of the Microsoft licence - Discourage alternatives — Google Workspace, Zoho, or other competitors are rarely recommended because they earn the MSP nothing
Azure Consumption
Microsoft's Azure partner program pays MSPs based on their clients' Azure consumption. The more a client spends on Azure, the higher the MSP's rebate.
The result: MSPs may recommend migrating workloads to Azure even when on-premises or alternative cloud solutions would be more cost-effective. The recommendation is technically sound (Azure is a good platform) but financially motivated.
The Copilot Push
In 2025–2026, Microsoft has aggressively pushed Copilot (their AI assistant) through partner channels. MSPs receive bonus incentives for Copilot adoption, creating pressure to recommend it even for clients who may not benefit.
What to watch: If your MSP suddenly recommends Microsoft Copilot without a clear use case, ask whether this is driven by your needs or their incentives.
The Hardware Vendor Influence
Hardware vendor partnerships create similar dynamics:
The "Recommended" Stack
Most MSPs standardise on a small set of hardware vendors. This is partly practical (managing fewer vendors is easier) and partly driven by partner incentives:
- Dell or HP for servers and workstations — MSPs get partner pricing and can mark up hardware
- Cisco or Meraki for networking — High margins but significant ongoing licensing costs
- Fortinet for firewalls — Good products, but MSPs often default to them because of partner margins
The client impact: When an MSP recommends "enterprise-grade" hardware, part of that recommendation may be driven by their vendor relationship rather than your specific needs. A $5,000 Meraki switch might serve the same function as a $1,500 alternative — but the MSP earns more on the Meraki.
The Licensing Trap
Modern hardware increasingly requires ongoing subscriptions:
- Cisco Meraki requires annual licensing or the equipment stops working
- Fortinet charges for firmware updates and threat intelligence
- Even printers now have subscription-based toner programs
MSPs benefit from these subscriptions because they create recurring revenue. Each renewal is another touchpoint, another opportunity to demonstrate value, and another billing cycle.
The RMM/PSA Tool Trap
MSPs use Remote Monitoring and Management (RMM) and Professional Services Automation (PSA) tools to manage their clients. The major vendors — ConnectWise, Kaseya (Datto), and NinjaRMM — have their own partner programs.
How this affects clients:
- Standardised tooling — Your MSP may use a particular monitoring tool not because it is best for you, but because it integrates with their existing stack
- Vendor lock-in — If your MSP uses ConnectWise for everything, migrating to a new provider means rebuilding all monitoring and ticketing
- Security implications — RMM tools have been targeted by attackers (the Kaseya VSA attack being the most prominent example)
For clients: Ask which RMM and PSA tools your MSP uses. Understand that this choice affects your security posture and your ability to switch providers.
How Vendor Incentives Distort Recommendations
The most problematic vendor influence is when MSPs recommend technology that benefits the MSP more than the client:
The Cloud Migration Push
Many MSPs push clients to migrate to the cloud (specifically Azure) because: - Azure consumption generates ongoing revenue for the MSP - Cloud environments are easier for the MSP to manage remotely - Cloud licensing creates recurring margin
But the cloud is not always better. For some workloads, on-premises infrastructure is more cost-effective, more secure, and more performant. A good MSP evaluates each workload on its merits, not on what generates the highest margin.
The Security Stack Lock-In
MSPs often deploy their own security stack — EDR, SIEM, email filtering — through vendor partnerships. This stack may be: - More expensive than alternatives the client could source directly - Less effective than best-of-breed solutions - Difficult to extract if the client switches providers
The "managed security" pitch: "We handle all your security for one monthly fee." Convenient, yes. But you are also paying for the MSP's vendor margins and losing the ability to independently evaluate your security posture.
The Subscription Everything Model
Every vendor now wants to sell subscriptions rather than perpetual licences. MSPs prefer this too — subscriptions generate recurring revenue and make pricing simpler to manage. But for clients, the math often does not work:
- A $10,000 perpetual licence paid once is cheaper than $500/month over 3 years
- Subscription pricing locks you into the vendor's ecosystem
- Annual price increases are common and often not disclosed upfront
How to Navigate Vendor Influence
- Ask why — When your MSP recommends a specific technology, ask why they chose it. "Because it is what we use" is not a sufficient answer.
- Get second opinions — If a recommendation seems expensive, ask an independent consultant for a review.
- Separate licensing from management — Consider purchasing licences directly and paying the MSP only for management. This removes the margin incentive.
- Demand transparency — Ask your MSP to disclose their vendor partnerships and any financial incentives tied to their recommendations.
- Evaluate alternatives — Just because your MSP does not partner with a vendor does not mean that vendor is not a good fit for you.
The Bottom Line
Vendor relationships are a fundamental part of how MSPs operate. They are not inherently corrupt — good partnerships provide genuine benefits like better pricing, training, and support. But when vendor incentives drive recommendations rather than client needs, you are paying for the MSP's business model, not just IT services.
The best MSPs are transparent about their vendor relationships and can articulate why they recommend specific technologies based on your needs — not their margins.
Related Reading
- MSP Contract Red Flags — Warning signs your MSP is prioritising vendor incentives over your needs
- Hidden Costs of MSPs — The margin stacking and vendor kickbacks that inflate your bill
- How to Choose an MSP — What to ask about vendor relationships during due diligence
- MSP Due Diligence Checklist — Questions to uncover vendor conflicts of interest
- MSP Cost Calculator — See how vendor margins affect your total IT spend
Was this helpful?