πŸ”

Capgemini (inc. Empired) vs Codux: Which MSP is Better? | The MSP Playbook

Article 2026-07-27

Capgemini (inc. Empired) vs Codux

A detailed comparison of two major Australian Managed Service Providers.

Feature Capgemini (inc. Empired) Codux
Overall Score2.83.7
TypeGlobal IntegratorBoutique / High-Growth
Employees1500-200010-30
Founded19672018
HeadquartersSydney, NSW (Global HQ: Paris, France)Spotswood, VIC
RevenuePrivatePrivate
Salary Range$95,000 - $180,000$70,000 - $110,000
SpecialtiesCloud, Microsoft Dynamics, Enterprise Applications, ConsultingMicrosoft 365, Teams & Modern Workplace, Cloud Migration, Cybersecurity, IT Advisory / vCIO, Digital Transformation
CertificationsMicrosoft Partner, AWS Partner, Salesforce Partner, SAP PartnerMicrosoft Partner
Green FlagsLarge global scale Ò€” can handle enterprise projects
Some genuinely talented people in specific teams
Good vendor partnerships and certification support
Modern, software-first approach to IT services
Strong focus on Microsoft 365 and Teams expertise
Flexible work culture with emphasis on learning
Boutique advisory model (vCIO) differentiates from commoditised MSPs
Positive client testimonials across multiple sectors
Red Flags66% offshore workforce Ò€” highest of any major Australian MSP
Annual restructuring cycles Ò€” predictably unpredictable
Acquired 4 companies in 5 years, erased all brands
Below-market salaries (A$113K average vs A$128-138K market)
Razer data breach: US$6.5M in damages awarded
BOQ and ME Bank offshoring scandals documented
Glassdoor reviews describe 'toxic' culture in some teams
Very small scale limits career progression
Below-market pay for senior roles vs enterprise MSPs
Limited brand recognition outside Melbourne
Boutique size means less job security during downturns
Narrow technology stack focus (heavily Microsoft-centric)
Worker ProsExposure to large, complex projects
Global brand opens doors
Some teams have excellent managers
Modern tech stack with Microsoft-centric focus
Flexible, contemporary work culture
Strong emphasis on learning and development
Direct client exposure across strategy and delivery
Autonomy and ownership of work
Worker Cons66% offshore means onshore roles are increasingly 'bridge' positions
Annual restructuring creates constant uncertainty
Below-market salaries with opaque promotion processes
Four acquired companies erased Ò€” expect yours next
Executive bonuses while staff are made redundant
Small scale limits career progression
Below-market pay for senior roles
Limited brand recognition outside Victoria
Heavy reliance on Microsoft ecosystem
Less structured HR/P&C than larger firms

Which MSP Should You Choose?

Both Global Integrator and Boutique / High-Growth have strengths and weaknesses. Your choice depends on your priorities β€” whether that's career growth, salary, work-life balance, or technical exposure.

Use the side-by-side comparison tool for a deeper look, or check out individual profiles for detailed employee reviews.