πŸ”

Capgemini (inc. Empired) vs Cognizant: Which MSP is Better? | The MSP Playbook

Article 2026-07-27

Capgemini (inc. Empired) vs Cognizant

A detailed comparison of two major Australian Managed Service Providers.

Feature Capgemini (inc. Empired) Cognizant
Overall Score2.83.6
TypeGlobal IntegratorGlobal IT Services / Digital
Employees1500-2000350000
Founded19671994
HeadquartersSydney, NSW (Global HQ: Paris, France)Teaneck, New Jersey, USA
RevenuePrivate$19.4B
Salary Range$95,000 - $180,000$50,000 - $150,000
SpecialtiesCloud, Microsoft Dynamics, Enterprise Applications, ConsultingManaged Services, Cloud, AI & Data, Digital Transformation, Consulting, BPO
CertificationsMicrosoft Partner, AWS Partner, Salesforce Partner, SAP PartnerMicrosoft Partner, AWS Partner, Google Cloud Partner, Salesforce Partner, ISO 27001
Green FlagsLarge global scale Ò€” can handle enterprise projects
Some genuinely talented people in specific teams
Good vendor partnerships and certification support
Strong US and European presence with deep financial services expertise
Digital-first pivot (Cognizant Digital Business, Cognizant Consulting)
Excellent training and development programs (Cognizant Academy)
Broad service portfolio spanning IT, consulting, and BPO
Red Flags66% offshore workforce Ò€” highest of any major Australian MSP
Annual restructuring cycles Ò€” predictably unpredictable
Acquired 4 companies in 5 years, erased all brands
Below-market salaries (A$113K average vs A$128-138K market)
Razer data breach: US$6.5M in damages awarded
BOQ and ME Bank offshoring scandals documented
Glassdoor reviews describe 'toxic' culture in some teams
Margin pressure from commoditised application management and testing services
High attrition rates (20-24%) β€” significantly above industry average
Restructuring cycles under CEO transitions create organisational uncertainty
Below-market compensation for US-based technical talent
Offshoring model means onshore roles in the US/EU are decreasing
Worker ProsExposure to large, complex projects
Global brand opens doors
Some teams have excellent managers
Strong US brand with good global project diversity
Digital transformation focus provides modern tech exposure
Formal training infrastructure is well-regarded
Financial services expertise is genuinely deep
Worker Cons66% offshore means onshore roles are increasingly 'bridge' positions
Annual restructuring creates constant uncertainty
Below-market salaries with opaque promotion processes
Four acquired companies erased Ò€” expect yours next
Executive bonuses while staff are made redundant
Below-market salaries for US-based technical roles
High attrition creates constant team instability
Restructuring cycles create anxiety and uncertainty
Onshore technical roles are being phased down
Bureaucratic culture with matrix management overhead

Which MSP Should You Choose?

Both Global Integrator and Global IT Services / Digital have strengths and weaknesses. Your choice depends on your priorities β€” whether that's career growth, salary, work-life balance, or technical exposure.

Use the side-by-side comparison tool for a deeper look, or check out individual profiles for detailed employee reviews.