πŸ”

Codux vs NTT Ltd.: Which MSP is Better? | The MSP Playbook

Article 2026-07-27

Codux vs NTT Ltd.

A detailed comparison of two major Australian Managed Service Providers.

Feature Codux NTT Ltd.
Overall Score3.73.0
TypeBoutique / High-GrowthGlobal Infrastructure
Employees10-302000-3000
Founded20182019
HeadquartersSpotswood, VICSydney, NSW (Global HQ: Tokyo)
RevenuePrivatePrivate
Salary Range$70,000 - $110,000$85,000 - $165,000
SpecialtiesMicrosoft 365, Teams & Modern Workplace, Cloud Migration, Cybersecurity, IT Advisory / vCIO, Digital TransformationManaged Network Services, Data Centre, Cloud, Unified Communications
CertificationsMicrosoft PartnerMicrosoft Partner, Cisco Partner, VMware Partner, Fortinet Partner
Green FlagsModern, software-first approach to IT services
Strong focus on Microsoft 365 and Teams expertise
Flexible work culture with emphasis on learning
Boutique advisory model (vCIO) differentiates from commoditised MSPs
Positive client testimonials across multiple sectors
Competitive salaries (A$95-110K average)
Global opportunities through 190,000+ employee network
Technology investment in AI, cloud, IoT
Good vendor partnerships
Red FlagsVery small scale limits career progression
Below-market pay for senior roles vs enterprise MSPs
Limited brand recognition outside Melbourne
Boutique size means less job security during downturns
Narrow technology stack focus (heavily Microsoft-centric)
A$677K revenue per employee Ò€” thin onshore coverage
~70% offshore ratio Ò€” highest of any major MSP
Cultural integration issues from multiple acquisitions
Onshore roles increasingly 'bridge' positions managing offshore delivery
Client satisfaction issues with offshore quality
Worker ProsModern tech stack with Microsoft-centric focus
Flexible, contemporary work culture
Strong emphasis on learning and development
Direct client exposure across strategy and delivery
Autonomy and ownership of work
Salaries are competitive relative to other MSPs
Global exposure and transfer opportunities
Investment in emerging technologies
Good certification and training programs
Worker ConsSmall scale limits career progression
Below-market pay for senior roles
Limited brand recognition outside Victoria
Heavy reliance on Microsoft ecosystem
Less structured HR/P&C than larger firms
70% offshore means onshore roles are increasingly managerial
Cultural friction between Australian and Indian teams
Communication overhead across time zones
Career ceiling for onshore staff
Quality issues with offshore delivery

Which MSP Should You Choose?

Both Boutique / High-Growth and Global Infrastructure have strengths and weaknesses. Your choice depends on your priorities β€” whether that's career growth, salary, work-life balance, or technical exposure.

Use the side-by-side comparison tool for a deeper look, or check out individual profiles for detailed employee reviews.