πŸ”

Codux vs Sopra Steria: Which MSP is Better? | The MSP Playbook

Article 2026-07-27

Codux vs Sopra Steria

A detailed comparison of two major Australian Managed Service Providers.

Feature Codux Sopra Steria
Overall Score3.73.7
TypeBoutique / High-GrowthEuropean IT Consulting / Services
Employees10-3055000
Founded20182014 (merger of Sopra Group and Steria)
HeadquartersSpotswood, VICParis, France
RevenuePrivate$5.8B
Salary Range$70,000 - $110,000$40,000 - $120,000
SpecialtiesMicrosoft 365, Teams & Modern Workplace, Cloud Migration, Cybersecurity, IT Advisory / vCIO, Digital TransformationConsulting, Managed Services, Cloud, Digital Transformation, Public Sector IT, Enterprise Applications
CertificationsMicrosoft PartnerMicrosoft Partner, AWS Partner, SAP Partner, Oracle Partner, ISO 27001
Green FlagsModern, software-first approach to IT services
Strong focus on Microsoft 365 and Teams expertise
Flexible work culture with emphasis on learning
Boutique advisory model (vCIO) differentiates from commoditised MSPs
Positive client testimonials across multiple sectors
Strong French and European market presence with deep public sector expertise
Successful digital and cloud transformation journey from legacy IT services
Good work-life balance culture by consulting industry standards
Employee share ownership program creates engagement
Strong design and UX consulting capabilities (via Sopra Steria Digital)
Red FlagsVery small scale limits career progression
Below-market pay for senior roles vs enterprise MSPs
Limited brand recognition outside Melbourne
Boutique size means less job security during downturns
Narrow technology stack focus (heavily Microsoft-centric)
Heavy French market concentration β€” 60%+ revenue from France alone
Below-market compensation for top-tier consulting talent
French language essential for career progression β€” limits non-French talent
Public sector dependency creates political and budget cycle risks
Integration challenges from multiple acquired entities
Worker ProsModern tech stack with Microsoft-centric focus
Flexible, contemporary work culture
Strong emphasis on learning and development
Direct client exposure across strategy and delivery
Autonomy and ownership of work
Strong European market position and brand
Good work-life balance by consulting standards
Employee share ownership creates alignment
Public sector expertise provides stability
Digital and cloud transformation capabilities are genuine
Worker ConsSmall scale limits career progression
Below-market pay for senior roles
Limited brand recognition outside Victoria
Heavy reliance on Microsoft ecosystem
Less structured HR/P&C than larger firms
France-heavy revenue creates geographic concentration risk
Below-market compensation for top-tier consulting talent
French language requirement limits international talent
Public sector dependency creates budget risk cycles

Which MSP Should You Choose?

Both Boutique / High-Growth and European IT Consulting / Services have strengths and weaknesses. Your choice depends on your priorities β€” whether that's career growth, salary, work-life balance, or technical exposure.

Use the side-by-side comparison tool for a deeper look, or check out individual profiles for detailed employee reviews.