πŸ”

Datacom vs Sopra Steria: Which MSP is Better? | The MSP Playbook

Article 2026-07-27

Datacom vs Sopra Steria

A detailed comparison of two major Australian Managed Service Providers.

Feature Datacom Sopra Steria
Overall Score3.13.7
TypeGlobal EnterpriseEuropean IT Consulting / Services
Employees5000-600055000
Founded19652014 (merger of Sopra Group and Steria)
HeadquartersSydney, NSW (NZ HQ: Auckland)Paris, France
RevenuePrivate$5.8B
Salary Range$75,000 - $160,000$40,000 - $120,000
SpecialtiesManaged Services, Cloud Infrastructure, Data Centre, Application DevelopmentConsulting, Managed Services, Cloud, Digital Transformation, Public Sector IT, Enterprise Applications
CertificationsMicrosoft Partner, AWS Partner, Cisco Partner, VMware PartnerMicrosoft Partner, AWS Partner, SAP Partner, Oracle Partner, ISO 27001
Green FlagsPrivately held Ò€” no PE pressure, no quarterly earnings
Low offshoring (~20%) Ò€” most work delivered locally
Genuine work-life balance in most teams
Rarely does mass layoffs Ò€” stable employment
Largest locally-owned IT company in Australia
Strong French and European market presence with deep public sector expertise
Successful digital and cloud transformation journey from legacy IT services
Good work-life balance culture by consulting industry standards
Employee share ownership program creates engagement
Strong design and UX consulting capabilities (via Sopra Steria Digital)
Red FlagsBelow-market salaries (A$85-95K average vs A$128-138K market)
Career stagnation Ò€” 'dead man's shoes' culture
Internal politics favour tenure over talent
Graduate program used as cheap labour pipeline
Manager quality varies wildly between teams
Heavy French market concentration β€” 60%+ revenue from France alone
Below-market compensation for top-tier consulting talent
French language essential for career progression β€” limits non-French talent
Public sector dependency creates political and budget cycle risks
Integration challenges from multiple acquired entities
Worker ProsStability Ò€” private ownership means no restructuring cycles
Work-life balance is genuinely good
Local delivery Ò€” your job isn't being offshored
Good graduate programs with real mentorship
Strong European market position and brand
Good work-life balance by consulting standards
Employee share ownership creates alignment
Public sector expertise provides stability
Digital and cloud transformation capabilities are genuine
Worker ConsSalaries are 20-30% below market rate
Career progression is slow Ò€” 'dead man's shoes'
Manager quality varies wildly Ò€” your experience depends on your boss
Innovation is limited by risk-averse culture
Internal politics favour loyalty over competence
France-heavy revenue creates geographic concentration risk
Below-market compensation for top-tier consulting talent
French language requirement limits international talent
Public sector dependency creates budget risk cycles

Which MSP Should You Choose?

Both Global Enterprise and European IT Consulting / Services have strengths and weaknesses. Your choice depends on your priorities β€” whether that's career growth, salary, work-life balance, or technical exposure.

Use the side-by-side comparison tool for a deeper look, or check out individual profiles for detailed employee reviews.