πŸ”

Datacom vs Unisys: Which MSP is Better? | The MSP Playbook

Article 2026-07-27

Datacom vs Unisys

A detailed comparison of two major Australian Managed Service Providers.

Feature Datacom Unisys
Overall Score3.12.9
TypeGlobal EnterpriseUS Enterprise IT Services
Employees5000-600015000
Founded19651986
HeadquartersSydney, NSW (NZ HQ: Auckland)Blue Bell, Pennsylvania, USA
RevenuePrivate$2.0B
Salary Range$75,000 - $160,000$55,000 - $140,000
SpecialtiesManaged Services, Cloud Infrastructure, Data Centre, Application DevelopmentManaged Services, Government IT, Cloud, Cybersecurity, Airline Solutions, Mainframe Services
CertificationsMicrosoft Partner, AWS Partner, Cisco Partner, VMware PartnerMicrosoft Partner, AWS Partner, ISO 27001, FedRAMP
Green FlagsPrivately held Ò€” no PE pressure, no quarterly earnings
Low offshoring (~20%) Ò€” most work delivered locally
Genuine work-life balance in most teams
Rarely does mass layoffs Ò€” stable employment
Largest locally-owned IT company in Australia
Deep government and aviation solutions expertise β€” mission-critical systems
Strong IP portfolio in security (Stealth) and high-performance computing
Long-term government contracts provide stable revenue base
Resilient business model pivoting from hardware to services
Red FlagsBelow-market salaries (A$85-95K average vs A$128-138K market)
Career stagnation Ò€” 'dead man's shoes' culture
Internal politics favour tenure over talent
Graduate program used as cheap labour pipeline
Manager quality varies wildly between teams
Revenue decline for 8+ consecutive years β€” shrinking company
Massive pension liability burden constrains strategic investment
Below-market compensation across most roles and geographies
Legacy mainframe dependency limits innovation culture
Perpetual restructuring β€” headcount reduced from 40K to 15K over decade
Worker ProsStability Ò€” private ownership means no restructuring cycles
Work-life balance is genuinely good
Local delivery Ò€” your job isn't being offshored
Good graduate programs with real mentorship
Deep government and aviation domain expertise
Stealth cybersecurity platform is genuinely innovative
Stable government contract base
Long-tenured employees create institutional knowledge
Worker ConsSalaries are 20-30% below market rate
Career progression is slow Ò€” 'dead man's shoes'
Manager quality varies wildly Ò€” your experience depends on your boss
Innovation is limited by risk-averse culture
Internal politics favour loyalty over competence
Revenue decline for 8+ years β€” shrinking business
Massive pension liability drags on finances
Below-market compensation with limited growth
Legacy culture limits innovation and agility
Constant restructuring reduces morale

Which MSP Should You Choose?

Both Global Enterprise and US Enterprise IT Services have strengths and weaknesses. Your choice depends on your priorities β€” whether that's career growth, salary, work-life balance, or technical exposure.

Use the side-by-side comparison tool for a deeper look, or check out individual profiles for detailed employee reviews.