πŸ”

Getronics vs NTT Ltd.: Which MSP is Better? | The MSP Playbook

Article 2026-07-27

Getronics vs NTT Ltd.

A detailed comparison of two major Australian Managed Service Providers.

Feature Getronics NTT Ltd.
Overall Score3.13.0
TypeEuropean MSPGlobal Infrastructure
Employees35002000-3000
Founded18872019
HeadquartersAmsterdam, NetherlandsSydney, NSW (Global HQ: Tokyo)
Revenue$600MPrivate
Salary Range$35,000 - $110,000$85,000 - $165,000
SpecialtiesManaged Services, Digital Workplace, Cloud, Cybersecurity, Modern Workplace, IT InfrastructureManaged Network Services, Data Centre, Cloud, Unified Communications
CertificationsMicrosoft Partner, AWS Partner, Cisco Partner, ISO 27001Microsoft Partner, Cisco Partner, VMware Partner, Fortinet Partner
Green FlagsStrong European heritage and 135+ year history in technology services
Deep Benelux market presence with good government relationships
Digital workplace and modern workplace services are well-regarded
Workspace 365 and digital workplace IP provides product differentiation
Competitive salaries (A$95-110K average)
Global opportunities through 190,000+ employee network
Technology investment in AI, cloud, IoT
Good vendor partnerships
Red FlagsFinancial instability β€” multiple ownership changes, near-collapse events
Massive downsizing from peak of 28,000 employees to ~3,500
Private equity ownership churn creates strategic whiplash
Brand reputation damaged by repeated restructuring and asset sales
Limited geographic scope outside Benelux and UK
A$677K revenue per employee Ò€” thin onshore coverage
~70% offshore ratio Ò€” highest of any major MSP
Cultural integration issues from multiple acquisitions
Onshore roles increasingly 'bridge' positions managing offshore delivery
Client satisfaction issues with offshore quality
Worker ProsLong heritage and established brand in Benelux
Digital workplace IP (Workspace 365) is genuinely useful
Good relationships with Benelux government clients
Modern workplace focus aligns with market demand
Salaries are competitive relative to other MSPs
Global exposure and transfer opportunities
Investment in emerging technologies
Good certification and training programs
Worker ConsMultiple ownership changes create strategic whiplash
Massive downsizing from 28K to 3.5K β€” shadow of former self
Below-market compensation across most roles
Limited geographic reach outside Benelux/UK
70% offshore means onshore roles are increasingly managerial
Cultural friction between Australian and Indian teams
Communication overhead across time zones
Career ceiling for onshore staff
Quality issues with offshore delivery

Which MSP Should You Choose?

Both European MSP and Global Infrastructure have strengths and weaknesses. Your choice depends on your priorities β€” whether that's career growth, salary, work-life balance, or technical exposure.

Use the side-by-side comparison tool for a deeper look, or check out individual profiles for detailed employee reviews.