πŸ”

Infosys vs Kyndryl Australia: Which MSP is Better? | The MSP Playbook

Article 2026-07-27

Infosys vs Kyndryl Australia

A detailed comparison of two major Australian Managed Service Providers.

Feature Infosys Kyndryl Australia
Overall Score3.52.8
TypeIndian IT GiantInfrastructure Spin-off
Employees3400001000-2000
Founded19812021
HeadquartersBengaluru, IndiaSydney, NSW (Global HQ: New York, NY)
Revenue$18.7BPrivate
Salary Range$18,000 - $110,000$75,000 - $140,000
SpecialtiesManaged Services, Cloud, AI & Automation, Enterprise Applications, Digital Transformation, ConsultingManaged Infrastructure, Cloud, Mainframe, Enterprise Migration
CertificationsMicrosoft Partner, AWS Premier Partner, Google Cloud Partner, SAP Partner, ISO 27001, CMMI Level 5Microsoft Partner, AWS Partner, SAP Partner
Green FlagsStrong global brand with 300,000+ employees across 50+ countries
Major investment in AI (Infosys Topaz) and digital innovation
Excellent formal training ecosystem (Infosys Global Education Center)
Diverse service portfolio spanning consulting to managed infrastructure
Fresh start Ò€” not burdened by IBM's bureaucracy
Focus on infrastructure services
Some teams have genuine technical depth
Red FlagsPerpetual margin pressure due to commoditized IT services pricing
High attrition rates (20-25% annually) signal talent retention challenges
Below-industry-average compensation for senior and specialized roles
Onshore roles increasingly limited as delivery shifts to offshore hubs
Class-action lawsuits and SEC settlements for immigration compliance failures
Spun off from IBM Ò€” still finding its identity
Inherited IBM's legacy contracts and problems
Below-market salaries
High offshore ratio
Uncertain strategic direction
Worker ProsLarge-scale global presence with opportunities across continents
Strong learning and development investment (Infosys Global Education Center)
Brand recognition opens doors for future career moves
Good exposure to diverse industries and technology stacks
Fresh start Ò€” can build culture from scratch
Infrastructure focus is clear
Some technical teams are excellent
Worker ConsBelow-market compensation for specialized talent
High attrition creates constant team churn and instability
Onshore roles are increasingly project management, not engineering
Bureaucratic processes slow decision-making and innovation
Inherited IBM's problems
Below-market salaries
Uncertain strategic direction
High offshore ratio

Which MSP Should You Choose?

Both Indian IT Giant and Infrastructure Spin-off have strengths and weaknesses. Your choice depends on your priorities β€” whether that's career growth, salary, work-life balance, or technical exposure.

Use the side-by-side comparison tool for a deeper look, or check out individual profiles for detailed employee reviews.