πŸ”

Infosys vs NTT Ltd.: Which MSP is Better? | The MSP Playbook

Article 2026-07-27

Infosys vs NTT Ltd.

A detailed comparison of two major Australian Managed Service Providers.

Feature Infosys NTT Ltd.
Overall Score3.53.0
TypeIndian IT GiantGlobal Infrastructure
Employees3400002000-3000
Founded19812019
HeadquartersBengaluru, IndiaSydney, NSW (Global HQ: Tokyo)
Revenue$18.7BPrivate
Salary Range$18,000 - $110,000$85,000 - $165,000
SpecialtiesManaged Services, Cloud, AI & Automation, Enterprise Applications, Digital Transformation, ConsultingManaged Network Services, Data Centre, Cloud, Unified Communications
CertificationsMicrosoft Partner, AWS Premier Partner, Google Cloud Partner, SAP Partner, ISO 27001, CMMI Level 5Microsoft Partner, Cisco Partner, VMware Partner, Fortinet Partner
Green FlagsStrong global brand with 300,000+ employees across 50+ countries
Major investment in AI (Infosys Topaz) and digital innovation
Excellent formal training ecosystem (Infosys Global Education Center)
Diverse service portfolio spanning consulting to managed infrastructure
Competitive salaries (A$95-110K average)
Global opportunities through 190,000+ employee network
Technology investment in AI, cloud, IoT
Good vendor partnerships
Red FlagsPerpetual margin pressure due to commoditized IT services pricing
High attrition rates (20-25% annually) signal talent retention challenges
Below-industry-average compensation for senior and specialized roles
Onshore roles increasingly limited as delivery shifts to offshore hubs
Class-action lawsuits and SEC settlements for immigration compliance failures
A$677K revenue per employee Ò€” thin onshore coverage
~70% offshore ratio Ò€” highest of any major MSP
Cultural integration issues from multiple acquisitions
Onshore roles increasingly 'bridge' positions managing offshore delivery
Client satisfaction issues with offshore quality
Worker ProsLarge-scale global presence with opportunities across continents
Strong learning and development investment (Infosys Global Education Center)
Brand recognition opens doors for future career moves
Good exposure to diverse industries and technology stacks
Salaries are competitive relative to other MSPs
Global exposure and transfer opportunities
Investment in emerging technologies
Good certification and training programs
Worker ConsBelow-market compensation for specialized talent
High attrition creates constant team churn and instability
Onshore roles are increasingly project management, not engineering
Bureaucratic processes slow decision-making and innovation
70% offshore means onshore roles are increasingly managerial
Cultural friction between Australian and Indian teams
Communication overhead across time zones
Career ceiling for onshore staff
Quality issues with offshore delivery

Which MSP Should You Choose?

Both Indian IT Giant and Global Infrastructure have strengths and weaknesses. Your choice depends on your priorities β€” whether that's career growth, salary, work-life balance, or technical exposure.

Use the side-by-side comparison tool for a deeper look, or check out individual profiles for detailed employee reviews.