πŸ”

Leidos vs Sopra Steria: Which MSP is Better? | The MSP Playbook

Article 2026-07-27

Leidos vs Sopra Steria

A detailed comparison of two major Australian Managed Service Providers.

Feature Leidos Sopra Steria
Overall Score3.73.7
TypeUS Defense / IT ServicesEuropean IT Consulting / Services
Employees4800055000
Founded2013 (spin-off from SAIC)2014 (merger of Sopra Group and Steria)
HeadquartersReston, Virginia, USAParis, France
Revenue$16.0B$5.8B
Salary Range$70,000 - $180,000$40,000 - $120,000
SpecialtiesDefense IT, Cybersecurity, AI & Data, C4ISR, Digital Transformation, BiomedicalConsulting, Managed Services, Cloud, Digital Transformation, Public Sector IT, Enterprise Applications
CertificationsISO 27001, FedRAMP, NIST 800-53, CMMI Level 5, AWS PartnerMicrosoft Partner, AWS Partner, SAP Partner, Oracle Partner, ISO 27001
Green FlagsDominant US defense and intelligence IT contractor β€” mission-critical work
Strong technical depth in AI, cybersecurity, C4ISR, and biomedical
Fortune 500 stability with consistent revenue and earnings growth
Excellent benefits and pension for US-based defense sector employees
Science and engineering culture from heritage roots (SAIC spin-off)
Strong French and European market presence with deep public sector expertise
Successful digital and cloud transformation journey from legacy IT services
Good work-life balance culture by consulting industry standards
Employee share ownership program creates engagement
Strong design and UX consulting capabilities (via Sopra Steria Digital)
Red FlagsSecurity clearance requirement limits talent pool significantly
US-based only β€” limited international career mobility
Government contracting bureaucracy slows innovation and agility
Below-market compensation compared to commercial tech sector
Ethical concerns around defense work may conflict with personal values
Heavy French market concentration β€” 60%+ revenue from France alone
Below-market compensation for top-tier consulting talent
French language essential for career progression β€” limits non-French talent
Public sector dependency creates political and budget cycle risks
Integration challenges from multiple acquired entities
Worker ProsMission-critical work with national security impact
Excellent benefits and pension for US defense employees
Fortune 500 financial stability
Deep AI, cyber, and C4ISR technical depth
Strong European market position and brand
Good work-life balance by consulting standards
Employee share ownership creates alignment
Public sector expertise provides stability
Digital and cloud transformation capabilities are genuine
Worker ConsSecurity clearance process is slow and restrictive
Below-market comp vs commercial tech
Limited international exposure β€” US-centric
Government contracting red tape slows everything
Defense work ethics may conflict with personal values
France-heavy revenue creates geographic concentration risk
Below-market compensation for top-tier consulting talent
French language requirement limits international talent
Public sector dependency creates budget risk cycles

Which MSP Should You Choose?

Both US Defense / IT Services and European IT Consulting / Services have strengths and weaknesses. Your choice depends on your priorities β€” whether that's career growth, salary, work-life balance, or technical exposure.

Use the side-by-side comparison tool for a deeper look, or check out individual profiles for detailed employee reviews.