Macquarie Technology Group vs Managed Services Australia
A detailed comparison of two major Australian Managed Service Providers.
| Feature |
Macquarie Technology Group |
Managed Services Australia |
| Overall Score | 4.1 | β |
| Type | Enterprise / Cloud | Melbourne MSP / Cybersecurity |
| Employees | 500-800 | Not publicly disclosed |
| Founded | 1995 | Not publicly disclosed |
| Headquarters | Sydney, NSW | Melbourne, VIC |
| Revenue | $379.4M | Private |
| Salary Range | $85,000 - $170,000 | Not publicly disclosed |
| Specialties | Data Centre, Cloud, Managed Services, Government Cloud | Managed IT Services, Cybersecurity, Cloud, Microsoft 365, Network Management, Telecommunications |
| Certifications | AWS Partner, Microsoft Partner, VMware Partner | β |
| Green Flags | ASX-listed (ASX: MAQ) Γ’β¬β financial transparency Highest-rated MSP on Glassdoor (4.1/5) Strong focus on cloud and security Good culture and employee satisfaction | Cybersecurity-first positioning 24/7 system protection advertised Public Google review evidence available |
| Red Flags | Smaller scale Γ’β¬β less exposure to enterprise projects Limited international presence Can be bureaucratic in some teams | The displayed rating is a public client review signal, not an employee rating or editorial score |
| Worker Pros | Highest-rated MSP on Glassdoor Strong cloud and security focus ASX-listed transparency Good culture and employee satisfaction | β |
| Worker Cons | Smaller scale Γ’β¬β less enterprise exposure Limited international presence Some teams can be bureaucratic | β |
Which MSP Should You Choose?
Both Enterprise / Cloud and Melbourne MSP / Cybersecurity have strengths and weaknesses. Your choice depends on your priorities β whether that's career growth, salary, work-life balance, or technical exposure.
Use the side-by-side comparison tool for a deeper look, or check out individual profiles for detailed employee reviews.
π€―
Most people don't know this. Share this article with someone who's stuck at an MSP β it might change their career.
β
π₯
You've read 3 articles this session. Keep going!