πŸ”

NTT Ltd. vs Unisys: Which MSP is Better? | The MSP Playbook

Article 2026-07-27

NTT Ltd. vs Unisys

A detailed comparison of two major Australian Managed Service Providers.

Feature NTT Ltd. Unisys
Overall Score3.02.9
TypeGlobal InfrastructureUS Enterprise IT Services
Employees2000-300015000
Founded20191986
HeadquartersSydney, NSW (Global HQ: Tokyo)Blue Bell, Pennsylvania, USA
RevenuePrivate$2.0B
Salary Range$85,000 - $165,000$55,000 - $140,000
SpecialtiesManaged Network Services, Data Centre, Cloud, Unified CommunicationsManaged Services, Government IT, Cloud, Cybersecurity, Airline Solutions, Mainframe Services
CertificationsMicrosoft Partner, Cisco Partner, VMware Partner, Fortinet PartnerMicrosoft Partner, AWS Partner, ISO 27001, FedRAMP
Green FlagsCompetitive salaries (A$95-110K average)
Global opportunities through 190,000+ employee network
Technology investment in AI, cloud, IoT
Good vendor partnerships
Deep government and aviation solutions expertise β€” mission-critical systems
Strong IP portfolio in security (Stealth) and high-performance computing
Long-term government contracts provide stable revenue base
Resilient business model pivoting from hardware to services
Red FlagsA$677K revenue per employee Ò€” thin onshore coverage
~70% offshore ratio Ò€” highest of any major MSP
Cultural integration issues from multiple acquisitions
Onshore roles increasingly 'bridge' positions managing offshore delivery
Client satisfaction issues with offshore quality
Revenue decline for 8+ consecutive years β€” shrinking company
Massive pension liability burden constrains strategic investment
Below-market compensation across most roles and geographies
Legacy mainframe dependency limits innovation culture
Perpetual restructuring β€” headcount reduced from 40K to 15K over decade
Worker ProsSalaries are competitive relative to other MSPs
Global exposure and transfer opportunities
Investment in emerging technologies
Good certification and training programs
Deep government and aviation domain expertise
Stealth cybersecurity platform is genuinely innovative
Stable government contract base
Long-tenured employees create institutional knowledge
Worker Cons70% offshore means onshore roles are increasingly managerial
Cultural friction between Australian and Indian teams
Communication overhead across time zones
Career ceiling for onshore staff
Quality issues with offshore delivery
Revenue decline for 8+ years β€” shrinking business
Massive pension liability drags on finances
Below-market compensation with limited growth
Legacy culture limits innovation and agility
Constant restructuring reduces morale

Which MSP Should You Choose?

Both Global Infrastructure and US Enterprise IT Services have strengths and weaknesses. Your choice depends on your priorities β€” whether that's career growth, salary, work-life balance, or technical exposure.

Use the side-by-side comparison tool for a deeper look, or check out individual profiles for detailed employee reviews.