Data#3 vs SAIC (Science Applications International Corporation)
A detailed comparison of two major Australian Managed Service Providers.
Feature
Data#3
SAIC (Science Applications International Corporation)
Overall Score
3.8
3.5
Type
Publicly Listed Giant
US Government IT / Defense
Employees
1500-2000
24000
Founded
1977
2013 (post-split)
Headquarters
Brisbane, QLD
Reston, Virginia, USA
Revenue
$884.8M
$7.5B
Salary Range
$80,000 - $160,000
$70,000 - $170,000
Specialties
Microsoft Solutions, Cloud, Managed Services, Software Licensing
Government IT, Cloud, AI & Data, Cybersecurity, Digital Engineering, Defense Systems
Certifications
Microsoft Partner, AWS Partner, Cisco Partner, VMware Partner
ISO 27001, FedRAMP, CMMI Level 5, AWS Partner, Microsoft Partner
Green Flags
ASX-listed (ASX: DDD) Γ’β¬β financial transparency Strong Australian focus Γ’β¬β no offshoring agenda Good work-life balance Profitable and growing
Premier US government and defense IT contractor with 50+ year legacy Deep expertise in cloud migration, AI/ML, and digital engineering for DoD Strong clearance portfolio β works across all major US intelligence agencies Fortune 500 financial stability with consistent government contract backlog Good work-life balance by defense contractor standards
Red Flags
Below-market salaries at senior levels Government contract dependency Limited international exposure Acquisition-driven growth creates integration challenges
Security clearance dependency restricts hiring and career mobility Below-market compensation compared to commercial cloud/tech roles Government contracting bureaucracy limits innovation pace US-only presence β zero international career opportunities Spin-off culture (Leidos split) still creating identity challenges
Worker Pros
ASX-listed transparency Γ’β¬β you know the numbers Australian-focused Γ’β¬β your job isn't being offshored Profitable and growing Γ’β¬β stability Good work-life balance in most teams
Mission-driven work with national security impact Fortune 500 stability and government contract backlog Good work-life balance for defense contractor Deep cloud and AI/ML expertise in government context
Worker Cons
Below-market salaries at senior levels Government contract dependency creates cyclicality Limited international exposure Acquisition integration can be bumpy
Clearance requirement creates hiring bottleneck Below-market comp vs commercial tech sector Zero international presence or mobility Government contracting overhead slows innovation
Both Publicly Listed Giant and US Government IT / Defense have strengths and weaknesses. Your choice depends on your priorities β whether that's career growth, salary, work-life balance, or technical exposure.
Use the side-by-side comparison tool for a deeper look, or check out individual profiles for detailed employee reviews.
Contract red flags, salary data, and industry analysis. No spam.
β You're in.
π Table of Contents
📧
Before you go…
Get the Red Flag Checklist — the 12 contract clauses every Australian MSP worker should flag before signing. Plus weekly analysis delivered to your inbox.